Vintage Thing No.51 - Norman B4 Sports
It might be hereditary, too, My dad went on a European odyssey with my Uncle Phil on Uncle Phil’s 250 Panther and that had a Villiers 2T engine just like this Norman. They had a good time although the frame broke in Italy and we used to have a photo, now unfortunately lost, of an Italian blacksmith welding it up.
There was a good reason for Steve Wilson to choose the Norman B4 for the cover for his book - it's a good all round bike with few flaws and about as good a bike as a Villiers powered twin can get. And for me the Norman B4 Sports has the paradoxical attractions of not only looking good but being both rare and cheap.
I really ought to get one.
There are many other bikes that use the Villiers 2T 250 twin but none of them look this good or handle this well. The leading link forks were a Norman speciality and Norman have a competition pedigree that other Villiers 250 twins lack. A Norman B3, which is not quite so stylish, came second in the 250 class in the 1959 Thruxton 500. With its tuned engine it could do 90 mph. The B4 built on this reputation with a lighter frame and cafe racer styling that would have appealed to every cash strapped young blood of the time. It's got a flyscreen, dropped ace bars and a petrol tank of Tebaldi design. The 6 inch brakes are apparently a bit iffy but it's easy to forget (for me anyway) that this is a fifty year old motorcycle.
The Villiers twin is a 50mm x 63.5 unit with cast iron barrels and Villiers experts favour the 2T over the later 4T design due to latter’s harshness. The competition Norman had a tuned engine, with a 25mm carburettor and a compression ratio of 10:1 , as opposed to 8.25:1, but the B4 was restricted by a 22mm carb so ran out of puff at 70.
I remember talking to a noted Villiers tuner once who had persuaded circuit racing Villiers singles to get over 100 mph. I asked him what he thought of the twins and he said their bottom ends were too weak for the kind of things he did to his singles.
Back in the eighties, at the St Agnes Traction Engine Rally, I saw a 225cc Norman. This intrigued me for, at the time, I had a Honda 125 (not a Vintage Thing) and the insurance category for that went up to 225cc. Villiers sought to exploit this with the 1H 225cc single (a 63mm bore instead of the full size 66mm x 72mm 250 engine that I’ve got). The badge of the Norman warrior caught my eye as well but the name of Norman hardly inspires awe these days. Most people mishear it for Norton.
My awareness of Norman motorcycles dates back even more for a neighbour had a Norman Nippy moped when I was a boy. I can remember him riding it over a plank in the lane when my dad was digging up the road to connect our house to the mains water supply. I don’t know how nippy a Norman Nippy was but I suspect “not quite”. They were better than pedalling I suppose and where we lived in Cornwall there was no public transport except for the market bus on a Wednesday.
Superbike magazine once pointed out the peculiar names of British bikes. It was at the time of the “What’s yours called?” advertising campaign for the new Renault 5. British bikes of the 60’s could be called James, Norman or Francis Barnett – sometimes shortened to the even worse Fanny B.
Most Villiers powered bikes were so damned ornery that they aspire to the description of grey porridge. They were designed to provide utilitarian transport for the masses and weren’t quite so aspirational as scooters. There was no style statement associated with Villiers – the rockers had their Triumphs and the mods their Lambrettas. But the Norman was as good an attempt at a sporting Villiers powered bike as you can get.
Villiers bikes have been the Cinderellas of the classic British bike scene for years. An owner once told me that “The good thing about these old bikes is that they are so n-n-n-naff.”
A cheap old bike costs almost as much to restore as an expensive old bike. Painting and wheel building and any cosmetic work soon make up a larger proportion of the rebuild cost than simple engine and gearbox parts. Add in the rarity of cycle parts compared to something like a Triumph twin and the difficulties could soon outweigh one’s enthusiasm – unless it’s s piece of rolling sculpture like the Norman B4 Sports. Even then, you wouldn’t get your money back on the restoration but that’s not the point. The point is relishing something that looks right. And if it goes, that’s a bonus.
As a lapsed industrial designer, I’d really like to know who was behind this bike. Was it the founders, Fred and Charlie? Or was it an unknown and unsung draughtsman “with flair”? For that is what an industrial designer back then would have been called.
And who or what was this Tebaldi? Did Tebaldi design the bike? Or was it an aftermarket supplier of sporty tanks? Steve Wilson quotes the tanks as being of Tebaldi design so the name has some significance.
The only other reference to Tebaldi that I can find on the net is this one about Paloma Sports mopeds and this suggest that Tebaldi was a name in Italian motorcycle style in the 1960s, much like a well-known mod would have been a “face” in 1960s Britain
So who was Tebaldi? And who did such a good job on the Norman B4 Sports?
There's a reference to Tebaldi as a Milanese tank maker on this Moto Parilla site.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.motoparilla.co.uk/Parilla%20valuation.htm
A bit of judicious Googling found this current Milanese Tebaldi company putting in a patent application for outboard motor fuel tank design. Possibly the same company?
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP0114585.html
Nice work! I couldn't find anything about Tebaldi when I researched this post. It must be the same outfit on both counts. I'm still interested to know who the designer of this firm is/was.
ReplyDeleteAnd for some reason Parillas remind me of P G Wodehouse - "Gorillas? No, no, porillas, a species of South American wombat."
ReplyDeletegents. a journalist called John Thorpe persuaded Norman cycles director Ron Butler. to copy the italian styling to make the villiers engined norman stand out from the hords of other manufacturers using villiers engines. the italian tank suppliers sent half a tank as a sample. similar tanks were fitted to guzzis and other italian machines. up until then speedwell had supplied the tanks and panels. john suggested an all red bike with coloured tank panels, and suggested a visit to the milan show and copy the italian styling. he was behind the article where by a bike was picked off the production line and then kept for an extended test. the engineer the B4 was Ron Britain, assisted by tester Les Hatch, Andrew Chapman and Michael Turner.
ReplyDeleteI really like the human story behind machinery - who inspired whom, who did what and why. Italian styling was at its peak around this time and the Norman B4 Sports was so stylish
DeleteI had a B4 sport in 1964 to 1966.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry but to write about my adventures on it and about 15,000 miles I will have to use a proper keyboard. Please contact me if you would like more info.
Yes please! My dad went across Europe on the back of a Villiers-powered Panther two-stroke! My e-mail is capnblackman@gmail.com
DeleteI have a Norman B4 as my first bike. All rather ropey as bought as scrap, but got me around and went pretty well in the dry, coils died in the wet. Finally fitted a pair of genuine expansion boxes and really flew but overrun crackle was totally antisocial. Also fitted an alloy big bore manifold and Amal carb but never ran this and has sat in a shed for 45 years, but a mate has asked to restore it so handed over the bike and a spare Norman frame + a few sets of forks and a Greeves 2T frame. Hope to hear those pipes crackle again one day! Regret selling a good spare tank and filler cap, but we did that sort of thing 40 years ago when they were not worth much more than scrap. Now think it was rather a nice bike so hope we can get the bits and bobs to fully re-assemble and run.
Delete